City Stopped Tuning and Bought a Finisher
Manchester City won three league titles in four years and kept losing the one game that decided Europe. In 2022 it stopped tuning, paid £51.2 million for one striker, and changed the team around him. The rebuild is the part brand teams skip.
Most brand teams know this position. The business runs well. Distribution is solid, execution is disciplined, the plan gets delivered. And yet the result that decides the year keeps going the other way: the national reset, the anchor retailer's review, the one launch the board is watching. The ordinary weeks are won. The weeks that matter are not.
The usual answer is to tune. Tighten the plan, sharpen the execution, do what already works a little better. Manchester City spent two seasons doing exactly that, and then made a different call. The club's own record shows what it cost and what it bought.
The system that won almost everything
In 2020–21, City were confirmed as Premier League champions for the third time in four seasons. They spent the first months of that season without a recognized first-team striker: injuries to Sergio Agüero, carried over from the previous season, and then to Gabriel Jesus, left the squad without one until the beginning of December. They won the league anyway.
Then the season's biggest game went the other way. On May 29, 2021, City lost the Champions League final 1–0 to Chelsea.
That summer Agüero left as the club's all-time leading goalscorer. City pursued Harry Kane, then at Tottenham. On August 25, 2021, Kane announced he was staying. City did not sign a replacement striker. They kept the system and tuned it.
It worked, mostly. City retained the league title in 2021–22. And in the Champions League semi-final they lost again, 6–5 on aggregate to Real Madrid after extra time.
| When | The call | What followed |
|---|---|---|
| 2020–21 | Play on without a fit striker until December | League title; Champions League final lost 1–0 |
| Summer 2021 | Pursue Kane; when he stays (Aug 25), keep the system | League retained; semi-final lost 6–5 on aggregate |
| May 2022 | Sign Haaland, €60M (£51.2M), and change the team around him | 2022–23: league, FA Cup and Champions League |
Sources: Wikipedia season articles for Manchester City 2020–21, 2021–22 and 2022–23, and the entries for Erling Haaland and John Stones, each checked against the others; retrieved September 26, 2026. Borussia Dortmund announced Haaland's departure to City on May 10, 2022.
The call
In May 2022, City agreed to sign Erling Haaland from Borussia Dortmund for a fee of €60 million (£51.2 million). He was known for his positioning and finishing, especially inside the penalty area, and he was joining a club that had lost its all-time top scorer a year earlier and not replaced him.
The fee was the smaller part of the decision. City did not simply drop Haaland into the old team; its shape changed around him. John Stones, a center-back, spent the season defending in the back line when City did not have the ball and stepping into midfield beside Rodri when they did. The club added a player it had not had, and moved another to keep the midfield it was built on.
Haaland's goals in all competitions in his first City season, the most by a Premier League player in a single season. His 36 league goals were also a record. He finished top scorer in the league, the FA Cup and the Champions League.
On June 3, 2023, City beat Manchester United 2–1 in the FA Cup final. On June 10, they beat Inter Milan in Istanbul to win the Champions League for the first time. With the league already won, it was only the second continental treble by an English men's team, after Manchester United in 1998–99.
Manchester City
2020–2023Two seasons of winning the league and losing the game that decided Europe. One attempt to replace the missing piece failed in August 2021, and the club tuned instead. The second attempt succeeded in May 2022, and the club rebuilt its shape so the new player fit without giving up what already worked.
The signing was the visible decision. The team changed around it too, and that is the part brand teams tend to skip.
What this is not evidence of
One season proves less than it seems to. Football has plenty of expensive strikers who did not fit, and City were already the strongest side in England; the treble is not proof that any team adding any finisher wins. Haaland also arrived with a record. He had been named Bundesliga Player of the Season at Dortmund. City did not buy a hope.
And a team built around one player carries a risk it did not carry before. If the finisher is injured or leaves, the shape built to serve him has to change again.
The brand version of the same call
Strip out the football and the decision is common. A brand is strong where it is strong, and it keeps losing in one specific place: the club channel it cannot crack, the premium tier its line doesn't reach, the occasion a challenger owns. The team's reflex is to tune. Better promotions, better execution, a sharper plan.
Sometimes the loss is not a tuning problem. It is a missing capability: a product, a partner, a hire or an acquisition that does the one job the current system cannot. City's two years show the sequence. First, the losses clustered in one kind of game. Second, tuning was tried and won everything except that game. Third, the fix was a specialist, and it only worked because the rest of the team was changed to make room for it.
The third step is the one brand teams skip. They add the capability and ask it to fit into the existing plan unchanged. A premium line sold through the same promotions calendar as the core range. A new channel run by the team that runs the old one, on the old one's targets. That is signing Haaland and asking him to drop deep.
- Your losses cluster. You can name the one situation where the year keeps going wrong, and it is the same situation each time.
- You have already tuned. The obvious improvements have been made, and they helped everywhere except there.
- The capability exists and has a record. You are adding something proven elsewhere, not a bet on potential.
- You will change the system around it. Someone's role, targets or calendar moves so the new piece can do its one job.
- Not yours if the losses are spread across many situations, which means the base needs work first, or if nothing in the current plan can change to make room.
List your eight biggest misses from the last two years and mark the situation each one happened in.
Launches that stalled, retailer reviews that went badly, pitches for a new channel that were turned down. For each, write one line: where it happened and what was missing. If half or more share one situation, write down the single capability that would change it, and the one thing in your current plan that would have to move to let it work.
- What it costs
- Half a day with your commercial lead and your own records. The harder cost is the second list: naming what in the current plan has to give way.
- How you'll know
- Before your next planning cycle, you can say whether your losses cluster and in what situation. If they cluster, you have a capability to find. If they don't, you have tuning to do, and you'll stop looking for a signing to solve it.
Related from Sound Decisions: On Didn’t Sign Mbappe · The Ground Nobody Was Defending · Coke Built It. Pepsi Bought It.
Where does your brand keep losing? Get a read on it.
A sourced, dated read of the situation your brand keeps losing in, and what competitors hold there that you don't. Ask, and I'll run one.
Request a read